首页> 外文OA文献 >Repair of the pronator quadratus after volar plate fixation in distal radius fractures: a systematic review
【2h】

Repair of the pronator quadratus after volar plate fixation in distal radius fractures: a systematic review

机译:vol骨远端vol骨钢板固定后前屈肌的修复:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

textabstractTo position the volar plate on the distal radius fracture site, the pronator quadratus muscle needs to be detached from its distal and radial side and lifted for optimal exposure to the fracture site. Although the conventional approach involves repair of the pronator quadratus, controversy surrounds the merits of this repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of patients with distal radius fractures treated with pronator quadratus repair after volar plate fixation versus no pronator quadratus repair. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, on 23 July 2015. All studies comparing pronator quadratus repair with no pronator quadratus repair in adult patients undergoing volar plate fixation for distal radius fractures were included. The primary outcome was the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, grip strength, post-operative pain and complications. A total of 169 patients were included, of which 95 underwent pronator quadratus repair, while 74 patients underwent no pronator quadratus repair. At 12 months follow-up no statistically significant differences in DASH-scores and range of motion were observed between pronator quadratus repair and no repair. Moreover, post-operative pain and complication rates were similar between both groups. At 12 months of follow-up, we do not see any advantages of pronator quadratus repair after volar plate fixation in the distal radius. However, a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn from this systematic review due to a lack of available evidence.
机译:为了将掌骨板放置在radius骨远端骨折部位,需要从其远侧和radial骨侧分离前屈肌,然后抬起其,以最佳地暴露于骨折部位。尽管常规方法涉及对前屈肌的修复,但围绕该修复方法的优点存在争议。这项研究的目的是比较在手掌钢板固定后与未进行前屈肌直肌修复的情况下进行经前屈肌直肌修复的radius骨远端骨折患者的功能结局。 2015年7月23日,在Medline,EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中心登记册中进行了系统的搜索。所有研究均比较了接受vol骨钢板固定治疗vol骨远端骨折的成年患者的前屈肌翻修与不行前屈肌翻修。主要结果是在12个月时手臂,肩部和手部的残障(DASH)得分。次要结果包括运动范围,握力,术后疼痛和并发症。总共包括169例患者,其中95例进行了前屈肌翻修,而74例未进行了前屈肌翻修。在12个月的随访中,在前屈肌翻修和不修复之间,DASH评分和运动范围均无统计学差异。此外,两组的术后疼痛和并发症发生率相似。在12个月的随访中,我们没有看到在radius骨远端固定了掌骨钢板后,进行前屈肌直肌修复的任何优势。但是,由于缺乏可用的证据,无法从该系统评价中得出明确的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号